Forced Covid19 Jabs and The Nuremberg Code

I don’t know a lot about the Nuremberg Code so I cannot comment on whether the DeathJab violates it or not. What I do know a lot about is the tyrannical government response to Covid19 (I’m living through it.) Apparently the possible violation of the Nuremberg Code has been fact checked and has been found to be false. While most ‘fact checking’ today is done by the left to explain away bad behaviour, this fact-check is easily seen to be an outright lie.

Lets take a look at this statement.

• ‘World War 2-era.’ This little tidbit of information is completely unnecessary especially in the headline. So why is it there? For all intents and purposes this phrase is meant to relegate the Code to the distant past making it not relevant today. It’s an underhanded way of saying, ‘really does not mean much in the modern era.’
• ‘Legal and medical experts.’ The left uses this classic logical fallacy whenever they are trying to convince you that something must be true. The Appeal to Authority on its own means nothing which is why, say in a court case, the ‘legal and medical experts’ must be brought to the stand where their ‘expertise’ can be questioned and verified (or not.) In this case, we just have to believe that ‘experts’ are telling us this and because we have been told they are ‘experts’ we must not question them.
• ‘Research involving human subjects,’ vs ‘public health interventions.’ This bit of word play is childish. They are trying to create the illusion that the Poke and Hitlers experimentation are not in any way equal by using two different words to describe the things being compared. On one side we have ‘experiments’ and on the other we have ‘interventions.’ I’m willing to bet Hitler would have had no problem calling his experiments ‘public health interventions,’ in fact, I seem to remember part of his campaign against the Jews was based on the idea that they were disease carriers. By using different words to describe the actions they are trying to show you that they were in fact different. Pure word play.
• ‘According to Rappler and Full Fact.’ Who? More experts I assume … in this case just random names that mean nothing to anybody = but we should listen to them!
• ‘Extensive clinical trials.’ This is an outright lie. Compared to any other drug ever perpetrated on the people of the world, the ClotShot has received basically zero testing or clinical trials. Most interventive drugs require years of testing beginning with animals and finishing with ‘long-term’ testing to verify that no future surprises. The Sludge received none of that. No animal testing. Only a couple months of human experimentation. If they had done the testing, they would not have needed the governments of the world to give them complete freedom from liability if they started killing people. ‘Extensive clinical trials:’ what a joke!
• Finally ‘received emergency use authorization.’ There’s that pesky little Appeal to Authority again. I’m quite sure, if asked, Hitler would have given ’emergency use authorization’ for his experiments too. Authorization does not make anything true … ever. Don’t use this in your arguments … ever.

To sum this all up, as far as I can tell this ‘fact check’ is nothing but a childish attempt to explain away bad behaviour. It is full of logical fallacy and lies and should be taken at face value as being nothing but a justification for ‘research involving human subjects.’